Easiest monitor on eyes for daily usage

Discussion Forum   Forums   Display discussion   Easiest monitor on eyes for daily usage

This topic contains 640 replies, has 75 voices, and was last updated by  PCM2 5 days, 18 hours ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 631 through 641 (of 641 total)
Buying a monitor? Please refer to this thread. We appreciate your support!
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 28, 2017 at 3:18 pm #41475

    chirionutz
    Participant

    Why do you tell that the size of LG 29″ is as tall as 23″? Can you exemplify with a link from this site: http://www.displaywars.com/29-inch-16×9-vs-23-inch-16×9 ?

    January 28, 2017 at 3:31 pm #41476

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    You made a fatal mistake – it’s a 21:9 monitor not 16:9 – http://www.displaywars.com/29-inch-21×9-vs-23-inch-16×9. See also – https://pcmonitors.info/articles/the-219-2560-x-1080-experience/.

    February 1, 2017 at 12:43 pm #41503

    lapis
    Participant

    So in the end, I can choose only between two monitors that were left after another colleague. He had DELL P2416D (1440p) and P2417h (1080p).
    Which of those two do you think will be easier on eyes for long term use?

    Both should be PWM free (in addition, P2417h has low blue light mode, but I guess that can be replaced by f.lux). Main difference seems to be resolution and also antiglare is different – P2417h has classical matte surface, while P2416D is more semi-glossy (probably because it has AHVA panel from AUO).

    February 1, 2017 at 2:10 pm #41505

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    Hi Lapis,

    As noted in the review of the P2416D, the screen surface may be ‘light matte anti-glare’ but it also has a grainy surface texture. Similar if not slightly worse in that respect to the P2417H – it’s hard to seperate them based on that. The P2416D also has a ‘Low Blue Light’ mode called ‘Paper’, as explored in the review.

    The key consideration is pixel density – and viewing comfort therefore depends on your eyesight and the viewing distance. Either could be perfectly comfortable, but you need to ensure the pixel density works for your own eyes. That’s something I can’t answer for you I’m afraid, suffice to say the P2417H is the ‘safer’ choice in that respect.

    February 1, 2017 at 3:05 pm #41508

    lapis
    Participant

    PCM2, thank you for your answer.
    I have read the review of P2416D and it is written quite well. Regarding to the screen surface – as I compare both monitors, I can see only that P2416D has much more reflective surface than P2417H (it works a bit like a mirror when I look from the side and see the room in it) and it feels smoother on touch, but I can’t compare image grainyness – I guess I would need a magnifying glass for that. I think IPS screens like P2417H have also relatively grainy texture, right?
    Interestingely also P2416D has considerably more reddish color tint than P2417H on the same image preset (it is visible on white color, especially when using f.lux).

    Is there any advantage of using Paper mode as low blue light preset instead of f.lux?

    You are right, main difference will be probably the pixel density. What disadvantages can higher pixel density have, if I use scaling option in Windows 10 to enlarge the text to 150%? Text should then have similar size, it will be just smoother / less pixelated, which seems rather like a benefit.

    February 1, 2017 at 3:39 pm #41509

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    If you can’t see an obvious difference in graininess or more importantly you’re not bothered by that aspect of either, that isn’t something you need to worry about. The P2417H has a similar screen surface to other matte Full HD IPS models, yes.

    Using the ‘Paper’ setting achieves similar results to F.lux but doesn’t interfere with the application of ICC profiles on top, isn’t ignored by some applications (mostly games) and generally preserves the contrast and shade variety a bit better than using F.lux. Even at 150% scaling, provided it scales ‘cleanly’, you’ll gain some benefit from the higher pixel density in terms of clarity and how much information you can fit on the screen.

    February 2, 2017 at 7:36 am #41539

    romandrt
    Participant

    Hi again!

    Yesturday i’v bought Samsung S24E390HL, tuned it like you’v done it here https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/samsung-s24e390hl/ and have 1 question:

    “HDMI Black Level= Normal” – This option dissapeared from the monitor menu when i turned display up to 72 mhz and idk if this option working properly or may be is not working at all. Now im confused – should i stay with 72mhz or get back to 60 and be sure that this option is working (i see it and can change it).

    Also i will make some photos of backlight bleed soon – think it is too bad and may be i should get it back and change on a good one.

    February 2, 2017 at 7:43 am #41540

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    1) HDMI Black Levels are adjusted automatically for 72Hz as the monitor knows the source is not a limited range AV device.

    2) It is Hz not MHz.

    3) Unless you know how to capture backlight bleed in a way that accurately represents what the eye sees, don’t bother. They will be promptly deleted due to the potential to mislead others. There are enough misleading images like that floating around on the internet already.

    March 15, 2017 at 3:24 pm #42035

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    Really the three matte screen options (i.e. all you listed except the Dell S2316H) are very much equivilent for viewing comfort. They use similar panels and are all set up fairly well out of the box, complemented by flicker-free backlights with good brightness adjustment ranges. To me the Dell P2317H seems to offer the best value for money, as although performance may not be revolutionarily different to the others, it offers advantages in terms of ports and ergonomics.

    The S2316H is interesting due to its low haze (essentially glossy) screen surface. As far as viewing comfort goes some users would prefer that, others would find it makes little difference and others would find it worse. Particularly if their ambient lighting can’t be kept in check. One crucial factor in all this would be your own thoughts on the S242HL. What do you like about it and what don’t you like about it.

    If your uses are text-heavy then it may be worth considering a model with higher resolution as well. Perhaps the Dell U2415 or even a WQHD model. I know you may not have the budget for this now, but I think your first question may have alluded to the fact you could keep your Acer TN until you’ve saved up enough for something quite different?

    March 20, 2017 at 2:33 pm #42094

    forumuser98
    Participant

    need monitor 24 inch for coding .

    What matters:
    eye comfort even after long hour of usage
    text should be clear and not cause eye strains

    March 20, 2017 at 2:37 pm #42096

    PCM2
    Keymaster

    There are plenty of decent options out there of this size that promote viewing comfort by offering a flicker-free backlight, good brightness adjustment range, decent (not overly grainy) screen surface and ‘Low Blue Light’ settings. Various examples are included throughout this thread, but some to look out for include:

    Dell U2414H
    Dell P2417H
    Dell U2417H
    Samsung S24E390HL
    Samsung S24F350
    Personally I favour the last three from this list simply because they offer a slightly lighter (less grainy) screen surface, giving them a slight edge in clarity. But it’s not a massive difference and they are all quite similar for your uses.

Viewing 11 posts - 631 through 641 (of 641 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.