[Fermin]

Thanks a lot for the answer,

Reading at your reviews the Benq’s monitors have high brightness levels in low bright modes, I have serious problems with my eyes so I always try to put the minimum bright always, of course I always have light in the room to avoid dark conditions but my question is, with the low blue light mode (70%) is it very bright? or is it an adequate adjustment? (From my situation)
Maybe I can set my own low blue light mode more strict than the 70% mode?

Thank you very much

P.S: I found this Samsung curve monitor with VA panel and eye care technologies S27D590C, what do you think about it? I suppose than the curve is more marketing but the panel?

[PCM2]

I’m not sure what you mean by that. The EW2750ZL for example goes down to 19 cd/m2 at ‘0%’ brightness with everything else at default and would be even dimmer with an LBL setting active. I haven’t seen any LCD go much dimmer than that!

The S27D590C is similar to the newer S27E650C that we’ve reviewed. I wonder if the sub-optimal subpixel structure could prove distracting for you? It’s pretty subtle to be honest and may not be an issue, but might be worth avoiding just in case. The curve is barely noticeable to be honest. I wouldn’t say it enhnaces visual comfort on that model, although some may find it does. At any rate they’re using a much stronger curve on their models for this year. How that would impact viewing comfort, I’m not quite sure yet. Imagine such a curve is more for engrossing you into your viewing than providing a comfortable experience, but having tested steeply curved models already I actually find them good in both respects.

[Fermin]

Thanks for the reply I think I understand you, so with the EW2750ZL I can set a LBL mode with almost nothing of brightness and it can be very “soft” for the eyes?

And for you this is the best option for me? It can be anyone not necessarily the list I made (I don’t care about brands)

[PCM2]

That’s correct. And yes, I really think the EW2750ZL offers all you need and would be the best choice.

[toddreg]

just got the BenQ GW2470H and the initial settings seem to be lacking something and the color is not correct. Does anyone have suggested settings for this monitor t tweak it and bring out more of its potential. I am using it for office work and web browsing mainlyl

[Fermin]

Thank you very much PCM2

[drtim]

HI PCM2,

I am looking at the EW2750ZL, as well as the BL2700HT and BL2420Z. Both of these provide Portrait or Landscape Viewing Options, while the EW2750ZL does not. Do you know if BenQ will release a new BL line VA 27 inch model soon? Of these options, which would be the best for reading purposes?

Thank you.

[PCM2]

The BL2420Z does use a new generation AMVA+ panel that is similar to the EW2750ZL but smaller (perhaps a bit less responsive, which isn’t an issue for your uses). The BL2700HT uses an older but still very decent AMVA+ panel similar to the EW2740L. I’m not aware of any new VA ‘BL’ series models in the pipeline, but if you do fancy an adjustable stand I wouldn’t hesitate to go for one of the models you listed over the EW2750ZL for your uses.

[drtim]

What are your thoughts on the BL2710PT ? I know it is not a VA monitor. My #1 purpose for a new monitor is reading and eye health. I really like the option of an adjustable stand. Any other options that you would recommend? Thanks.

[PCM2]

As covered in the review, it offers a nice smooth matte screen surface and a range of useful ‘Low Blue Light’ settings (not on our review sample as it was an early revision). It also offers what I feel is a very good pixel density for viewing comfort for somebody with reasonable to good eyesight (corrected or otherwise).

The only thing I would say, though, is that I wouldn’t necessarily restrict yourself to BenQ’s models if considering 2560 x 1440 models. I can’t give you any decent reason not to go for the BenQ over some newer alternatives like the Dell U2715H for your uses. But be aware that just because BenQ are very effective at marketing ‘Low Blue Light‘, it doesn’t mean they do anything differently to what other manufacturers such as Dell do. Well they do in that they give you a convenient way to cycle through and quickly apply various ‘LBL’ settings, which is nice. But some of the moderatey effective settings (50-60% reduction) is quite comparable to the ‘Paper’ setting on most recent Dell models. And indeed manual adjustments to the blue colour channel yield similar results. I still do like the way BenQ have implemented their ‘LBL’ modes though and I think the flexibility and ease of access is nice.

[drtim]

Thank you.

For reading purposes which do you think is better – Dell U2715H or BenQ EW2740L ? I really wish the EW2740L had an adjustable stand. My #1 purpose for a monitor is reading, thus I can bypass the adjustable stand if need be.

[PCM2]

Really I think they’re both equally comfortable for somebody with fairly normal vision. I do feel the higher resolution and ergonomic flexibility of the Dell provides an advantage elsewhere, though.

[drtim]

Thank you. I do require reading glasses and as I progress in years, reading has gotten progressively challenging. Does that make a difference? I think I would prefer the Dell based on technology, I am just wondering if my eyes would think the same way?

[PCM2]

If you find it comfortable to use the computer with your reading glasses on, then it shouldn’t make a difference (either screen should be as comfortable as the other really). If you were trying to use the computer without reading glasses where possible, the lower pixel density of the EW2750ZL would actually be an advantage.

[drtim]

Is it accurate to say that a VA monitor is best for reading purposes? I also would love to read at the computer without reading glasses. I define an adjustable stand as one where the monitor can be used as either landscape or portrait.

Choices – Pros & Cons:

– BenQ BL2420Z – 24 inch VA monitor (I prefer a 27 inch monitor), ergonomic flexibility with adjustable stand, business line, new 2015 technology model, input – USB 2, 1920 x 1080 resolution

– BenQ EW2750ZL – 27 inch VA monitor, does not have an adjustable stand, followup to the EW2740L, newer model than EW2740L, new 2015 technology model, input – HDMI, 1920 x 1080 resolution

– BenQ EW2740L – 27 inch VA monitor, does not have an adjustable stand, older technology model, input – HDMI, 1920 x 1080 resolution

– BenQ BL2710PT – 27 inch IPS monitor, ergonomic flexibility with adjustable stand, business line, older technology model compared to BL2420Z, inputs – HDMI & USB 3.0, 2560 x 1440 resolution

– BenQ BL2700HT – 27 inch VA monitor, ergonomic flexibility with adjustable stand, business line, builds on the success of the EW2740L, newer model than EW2740L, but still older technology model compared to the BL2420Z, input – HDMI, 1920 x 1080 resolution

– Dell U2715H – 27 inch IPS monitor, ergonomic flexibility with adjustable stand, great inputs – including HDMI and USB 3.0, 2560 x 1440 resolution

So, creating a list like this helps me to know what I want. If I am accurate in saying that a VA (vertical alignment) monitor is better for reading purposes than an IPS (in-plane switching) monitor, then the ideal monitor, according to my limited knowledge, would be one that was VA and had ergonomic flexibility with an adjustable stand, LBL (low blue light) options, and was 2560 x 1440 resolution. Does such a monitor exist? The brand does not matter to me. Thanks.

[drtim]

Actually, looking at the recommendations page – https://pcmonitors.info/recommendations/ – the Dell P2715Q might be my best choice. What do you think? It is not VA but still appears to be good for text.

[PCM2]

If you’re happy to use scaling or the relevant zoom control in programs then yes, it (P2715Q) could be a good choice. Not necessarily the best choice, though, for viewing comfort, as scaling is really something of a necessity. You might be able to fit more text on the screen and still find it readable, but purely in terms of viewing comfort that is not advantageous.

Edit: I didn’t see your previous reply. If you are wanting to ideally read on the computer without reading glasses then really I’d suggest that a lower pixel density with strong contrast would make it easier. You might find you can start with a high level of scaling on one of the higher resolution models and slowly work up to using a lower level of scaling. But if you’re purely looking at imemdiate viewing comfort, the 27″ Full HD VA options would be your best bet.

[drtim]

Thank you PCM2. And is there such a thing as a VA 2560 x 1440 resolution monitor? I think I just realized that Full HD (full high-definition) is 1080p or 1920 x 1080 and WQHD (wide quad high-definition) is 1440p or 2560 x 1440.

[PCM2]

That’s right. And yes, you can get 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) VA models, but they’re 32″. Like the BenQ BL3200PT, Samsung S32D850T and AOC Q3277PQU.

[drtim]

In reply #37674 I would probably choose the BenQ BL2700HT. How do the two models you just mentioned (both 32 inch models) compare to the BL2700HT for reading purposes?

[Author]

Posts